Restoring the broken
We did a great deal of sharing about Latreia this week and spoke at three different churches…the fellowship has been amazing and I have really felt touched by people and their lives. It has been uplifting to be surrounded by such strong Christian fellowship. However, in the midst of all of these wonderful conversations, there was one that I was involved in that I still haven’t been able to wrap my head around. A man, alias Joe, was talking to our group about his work as a Christian peacemaker, describing to us how he is currently researching and writing a paper for an esteemed conference on the subject. He was very well versed in his knowledge and I could tell he is very passionate about the subject. In the same conversation he also shared with us how he has had many experiences serving meals to the homeless from a mobile soup kitchen. From these experiences and also from discussions with others in the organization, Joe shared that he “had finally figured out the root causes of homelessness.” Given his strong background in mission work, I incorrectly assumed I would agree wholeheartedly with his findings. Joe explained that people are homeless because, “on a graphic chart, they are at 0,0 with the domain as their environment and responsiveness and effectiveness as its axes.” He attributes this to their “enormous pride, their refusal to seek help, and their lack of self-esteem.” Whew. I must admit I had to bite my tongue and take a few deep breaths at this point of the conversation…
So I have taken a few days to digest his theory and I still find it rather disturbing. While it may be true in some cases, I would never use it as a sweeping generalization of why people are homeless. In our 26 weeks of travel I have had conversations with far too many people to know that it isn’t the case at all in most situations. People are homeless because they are broken…broken from addiction, broken from loss, broken from never being loved, broken from extreme hardship, the list goes on. Yet, looking at this list, none of these reasons for brokenness are chosen. Their lifestyle as a result of the brokenness and the patterns they follow may be choice but the catalyst that brought them to that point of brokenness is not by choice…a vital distinction I believe.
So here I go back to Joe’s theory. If homeless are at 0,0 then what does that mean to the rest of us? I disagree with Joe’s diagnosis principally on the fact that it is a cop-out for everyone else. Where is society’s responsibility on the chart? Through Christ we have been given the only thing that can cure the brokenness in our world…Jesus’ love. We are called not to judge but to love. So I believe that if we love, we shouldn’t give ourselves and our society the excuse that it is their fault, their choice. As Christians we have received a call to share Jesus’ love and compassion and the responsibility to reach out in love to the least of these…to restore those who are broken even if they may not realize it.
Kelly
